|
Post by MrWaistcoat on Oct 9, 2017 17:28:16 GMT
Reading the Quo MB's over the years, many will say "all was terrible after NTL"
But I remember a lot to be excited about. Although not getting an official release featuring all the songs, the "Charlie gig" was loved and treasured by Quo fans. I'm amazed my tape never got ruined from where I taped the show off the radio as listened umpteen times, as did thousands of us
Then of course was the eotr MK gig, again, not released very cleverly but a much loved (and bootlegged) thing for the fans
Perhaps I was influenced then by the managements official line. We were told the band was tighter, better,more professional now...so 82 better than Live! I agreed. Maybe my tastes have changed ? I now think Live! is basically the hardcore fans holy grail. There's just nothing better that we have.
But it's not a competition. They are all great gigs.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that disappointing as 1982 and BTB were, the band basically covered it's tracks with two great tours and the boots, radio shows and releases that emerged from this era
|
|
gav
Veteran Rocker Rollin'
Posts: 2,156
Favourite Quo Album: On The Level
|
Post by gav on Oct 9, 2017 18:13:18 GMT
It's a short-lived, but pivotal era for sure.
And the contrast between the polished recordings and the raw gigs is a highly curious one.
It fires my imagination to wonder where Quo would have gone had Lancaster stayed. Was he/wasn't he the one who wanted them to go back to their roots? Would that have come across in subsequent recordings? Or would they just continue to succumb to contemporary technological trends in both production and style?
What would "Dreamin'" have sounded like with a heavier, warmer Lancaster bass sound for example? And without the horrible, compressed Jeff Rich drum sound? And would Lancaster have continued down the pop route just to fit in commercially?
(And does it really matter? After all, a good song is a good song, and his Gaslight demos with Rick were decent songs IMO)..
Unfortunately for the music, the pair they drafted in after the 'split' completely suited the new soul-less, clinical style.
|
|
|
Post by dennis on Oct 9, 2017 19:59:16 GMT
It was very much a sign of things to come, a complete split between material recorded in the studio & the live performances. Perhaps of great significance was the fact that on neither tour did they play any post 1980 tracks, apart from a brief appearance by Dear John in the first few gigs of 1982. Perhaps this was the era when Rossi developed his loathing for nostalgia!
|
|
scott6
New Rocker Rollin'
Posts: 14
|
Post by scott6 on Oct 10, 2017 18:59:28 GMT
I suppose the fact that they finished recoding a new studio album, released it and then choice to play not a single song off it live speaks volumes.
|
|