|
Post by 4th Chord on Sept 26, 2022 15:22:18 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2022 16:35:00 GMT
Nothing wrong with solo gigs in the true meaning of the word as long as you get up on stage and play an instrument as well as sing, you have to be really inventive in your arrangement of songs. I'm not surprised people were annoyed at paying for an out of tune karaoke session.
|
|
az
Rocker Rollin'

Posts: 84
|
Post by az on Sept 26, 2022 20:47:13 GMT
Certain singers could carry off singing to a backing track. Go to a Pub that has live music and you'll see them. But Ian Brown? Over £40 a ticket? Oh... No thanks.
|
|
mortified
4500 Timer
   
Posts: 5,090
Favourite Quo Album: Hello!
Favourite other bands.: Gary Numan, Alabama 3, ZZ Top, Paul van Dyk, Jeff Beck, Bowie, Gerry Rafferty, Band of Skulls, UFO, S.A.H.B
|
Post by mortified on Sept 26, 2022 21:32:23 GMT
I think I might be disappointed. I really like Ian Brown as a solo artist. He made two staggeringly brilliant albums at the end of the 90's. Way better than the over-hyped Stone Roses. But his band were superb and played a massive part in those. This seems a very odd thing to do. But surely some fans must have known what was coming? Or have the BBC been selective in their choices of comments? As always to create the right mood for their agenda. The price of the ticket is academic and using that to press home whatever point it was they were trying to make is cheap, easy journalism. I'm reminded of Nicole Lacey. If anyone remembers. Never seen so many open mouths since they introduced us to Restless
|
|
|
Post by curiousgirl on Sept 26, 2022 23:47:20 GMT
Hmmm.
I guess it depends on how good they are as a performer. I saw Joan Armatrading in 2015, on her farewell touring tour. And she did this too. But, as Bluehighway says, she also played the guitar for which she was also known. Initially, I thought it was a bit odd but she had such a great stage presence, and we loved her songs, it was fine. And I guess it was much cheaper.
|
|