|
Post by dublinquo on Apr 11, 2020 0:31:10 GMT
We have heard the argument many times before that Quo were no longer Quo (or at least were never the same), following the departure of both John Coghlan and later Alan Lancaster. Maybe so. However, to my ears, these two tracks very much sound as though they were recorded by the same band.
OK, so we know that only the first one features JC on drums and AL on bass, while the second one features a different rhythm section. However, the sound created on both - Frame on lead vocals, Rick on harmony vocals, the two Teles at about the same volume on each, the inclusion of some piano & brass-sounding keys by Andy...and the similar tempo of each track somehow makes me develop a (false?) sense that both are one and the same band.
On a Quo heavy / Quo-lite richter scale, I think both of these tracks would result in a similar measurement, whereas e.g. Bye Bye Johnny and Runaway (both FF recordings) would IMO be more of a contrast, if measured against each other on the same scale. Others may disagree and if so, I wonder is it simply because both Spud & Nuff are seen in one of the performance videos and not the other....and it is this that might make LAGG come across - to some fans - as the heavier of the two and IDMI as the more Quo-lite?
In addition to the rhythm section personnel, other differences of which may or may not be of significance are the songwriters and producer credits for each track - LAGG composed by Rossi/Young and produced by Pip Williams; IDMI composed by John David and produced by Francis Rossi.
|
|
viza
Rocker Rollin'
Posts: 412
|
Post by viza on Apr 11, 2020 18:56:06 GMT
Actually I don't see them as very similar to each other. One is a fast shuffle, the other one is straight. LAGG has real brass section while IDMI has a awful synt brass sound, it sounds so sheap. LAGG has the drive in the guitars, in IDMI it's the piano that dominates. Don't think many drummers could do a shuffle in this tempo the same way as JC did. Alan's bass is more distinct than Rhino's and in this type of music I think it's a good thing (in another musical style it might be the other way around so it's nothing about who is the best bassist here). Alan's bass adds to the drive together with the guitars. In total there is much more power and energy in LAGG.
|
|
|
Post by MrWaistcoat on Apr 11, 2020 19:20:39 GMT
Well, to a non fan they will sound like the same band. Otherwise I'm with viza. LAGG has drive, power and oomph. IDMI, like quite a lot of later Quo stuff, goes for speed, but doesn't achieve power. Of the later Quo stuff, it's the mid paced rockers that better managed to be powerful, eg solid gold
|
|
|
Post by asthequoflies on Jun 11, 2020 15:59:23 GMT
I do like them both, but agree with the two posters above - just a different dynamic. LAGG has power, a more exciting rhythm sound. IDMI is piano driven, LAGG guitar driven.
The pair actually demonstrate quite well the difference between Status Quo and the so-called Quo "lite". Its that rhythm, that fat, greasy and hard hitting rhythm the band had in the 70s. IDMI is the antithesis of that, much more homogenised sound; good track though.
|
|