|
Post by Victor on Mar 17, 2016 8:37:00 GMT
Correct. It amazes me that there are so many people out there that rave about "The Party Ain't Over Yet" album and all the associated horseshit....it's like they're scared to admit that the fact is, after1978, Quo were shite. Sorry folks - they were shite. It amazes me that some people think that their opinion somehow holds more worth than others', and that somebody confuses OPINION with FACT. I'm not a fan of "The Party Ain't Over Yet", but I love "In Search of the Fourth Chord". As does freewilly and some others I think as well. In my humble opinion, liking bits and bobs here and there and disliking others is a far more respectable and well grounded opinion because it means that there's no prejudice at work that leads people to look at certain things with rose-tinted glasses and at others with shit-tinted ones. I don;t know if it's always a matter of rose- or shit tinted glasses FH. Facs simply mean different things to everyone. For example, where it's a fact for Davy and others they became shite after 76, for me it's a fact the shite started happening after 81 after never too late. I got into Quo through RAOTW and IYCSTH... Had I been born a few years earlier and gotten to know them around the time of say Hello, I might have very well had a different perspective as well. If bands have a certain style and they then change it into something else, then yes, for me a band may indeed become total shyte and that has nothing to do with any rose- or shit tinted glasses
|
|
|
Post by Railroad17 on Mar 17, 2016 11:47:38 GMT
I am a wearer of shite tinted specs...the disappointment of RAOTW was as intense for me as the England v West Germany World Cup quarter final of 1970.
|
|